{"id":311036,"date":"2026-08-14T12:33:40","date_gmt":"2026-08-14T06:48:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/insurancekhabar.com\/?p=311036"},"modified":"2026-08-14T12:33:40","modified_gmt":"2026-08-14T06:48:40","slug":"innovation-and-profitability-in-nepals-insurance-sector","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/english.insurancekhabar.com\/innovation-and-profitability-in-nepals-insurance-sector\/","title":{"rendered":"Innovation and Profitability in Nepal\u2019s Insurance Sector"},"content":{"rendered":"<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>\u00a0Anish BK<\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The insurance industry in Nepal is regulated highly, with products that have very little differentiation in their nature, with restricted pricing, and with customers whose expectations are changing fast. This study assesses the impact of product development, product enhancement, and service accessibility on the profitability of insurance companies in Nepal. Additionally, it assesses the level to which innovation practices have been adopted by insurance firms and whether these innovations also yield measurable short-run financial benefits. Primary data were generated through structured questionnaires applied to the executives of 33 insurance companies, while secondary data were sourced from the audited financial statement for five fiscal years starting from 2077\/78 to 2081\/82. This research uses a mixed-method design, descriptive analysis, correlation analysis, and Random-Effects regression to test the relationship between innovation activities and financial performance.<\/p>\n<p>It is found that insurance firms prefer to engage in non-disruptive innovations like launching of new products, bettering existing ones and making digital services more available.The study shows that product development and innovation are positively correlated with Profit. Also, it was found that product development and total cost have no significan impact on the profit in the short term while product innnovation, accessibility of service and total policy holde have significantly positive impact on profitabilty of insurance sector.<\/p>\n<p>The study concludes that innovation brings about operational ease but the financial return is rather slow. In the long run, insurance companies would have to keep investing in digital solutions that are customer-focused, up-to-date infrastructure, and staff training. The main policy implications are regulatory easing, simplification of product approval process, technology being more widely adopted, and financial literacy being improved which will all lead to an innovation-friendly environment where financial results of innovations are easily detectable.<\/p>\n<p>JEL Classifications: G22, O31, L25, G32<\/p>\n<p>Keywords: Insurance Innovation, Profitability, Product Development, Service Accessibility, Digital Insurance, Insurance Sector in Nepal, Firm Performance<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Innovation in products and services is widely recognized as a critical driver of profitability, sustainability, and competitive advantage across industries, including financial services and insurance. Product innovation enables firms to introduce new or significantly improved offerings that better address evolving customer needs, while service innovation enhances value through improved delivery processes, customer interactions, and service quality (Schumpeter, 1934; OECD, 2005). Prior studies demonstrate that innovation positively affects firm performance by increasing operational efficiency, reducing costs, and improving customer satisfaction and retention (Damanpour et al., 2009; Tidd &amp; Bessant, 2018). In service-intensive industries, innovation in digital platforms, automation, and customer experience management has shown a strong association with higher profitability and long-term growth (Den Hertog, 2000; Gallouj &amp; Savona, 2009). Empirical evidence suggests that firms investing in innovation outperform non-innovative firms in terms of revenue growth and market share (Rosenbusch et al., 2011; Artz et al., 2010). In the insurance sector, innovation in underwriting, claims processing, fraud detection, and personalized services has significantly improved risk management and cost efficiency, thereby enhancing profitability (Cummins &amp; Weiss, 2014; Lee &amp; Shin, 2018). Overall, the literature confirms that innovation, particularly service and process innovation plays a crucial role in strengthening profitability and sustaining competitive advantage in regulated financial markets.<\/p>\n<p>The adoption and impact of innovation on profitability vary significantly across countries due to differences in regulatory environments, technological infrastructure, and market maturity. Developed economies such as the United States, Japan, and European nations have witnessed substantial profitability gains from digital insurance innovations, including artificial intelligence-based underwriting, automated claims settlement, and data-driven pricing models (OECD, 2020; EIOPA, 2021). Emerging economies, particularly in South Asia, are increasingly leveraging digital technologies to expand insurance penetration and improve operational efficiency, albeit at a slower pace (World Bank, 2019). India has emerged as a regional leader, driven by government-led digital inclusion initiatives and regulatory support for insurtech innovations, resulting in improved customer outreach and profitability (Swiss Re Institute, 2022). Conversely, countries with restrictive regulatory frameworks and lower digital literacy levels experience uneven innovation adoption and limited financial returns (UNCTAD, 2021). Overall, cross-country evidence suggests that innovation contributes positively to insurance profitability when supported by enabling regulations, digital infrastructure, and institutional readiness.<\/p>\n<p>The insurance industry operates within a highly regulated environment, particularly in developing economies such as Nepal, where regulatory authorities play a central role in ensuring market stability and consumer protection. In Nepal, the insurance sector is governed by the Nepal Insurance Authority under the Insurance Act, 2079 (2023), which regulates product design, pricing, commissions, and promotional expenditures. These regulations significantly limit insurers\u2019 ability to differentiate products and innovate independently (Nepal Insurance Authority, 2023). As a result, most insurance products remain standardized, and competition primarily occurs through distribution channels and service quality rather than product features. Studies indicate that such regulatory rigidity constrains innovation but simultaneously increases the relevance of service and process innovation as alternative sources of competitive advantage (Sharma &amp; Kumar, 2017; Cummins et al., 2017). Despite growing internet and mobile penetration in Nepal, insurers face challenges such as weak technological infrastructure, limited digital skills among employees, and slow organizational adaptation, which further hinder innovation-driven profitability (ADB, 2020). Therefore, in Nepal\u2019s insurance sector, service innovation through digital platforms, online claims processing, and customer engagement tools represents the most feasible pathway to enhancing efficiency and profitability within the existing legal framework.<\/p>\n<p>The primary objective of this study is to examine the extent of product and service innovation adoption by insurance companies in Nepal and to analyze their impact on the profitability of insurers. Specifically, the study seeks to assess the role of service innovation and digital transformation in improving operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and financial performance within a regulated market environment. The significance of this research lies in the fact that it provides insights into the transformation that digital technologies have brought about to the functioning of insurance companies in Nepal. It examines the impact of the innovations in product development, service quality, and accessibility of services on the overall profit and performance of the insurance companies. This research reveals the current level of usage of technology in the insurance industry by determining the areas that are performing well and the difficulties that are still there. This study offers insurance companies to bring out better idea for developing new product and services that helps in inclusion of insurance for customers and\u00a0 deployment of digital tools like mobile apps and online systems. This study also, motivate and be the basis for insureres investors, board members and regulator to focus on innovation and investment in technology. This decision will help reduction of insurance costs in the long term and accelerate the customer service which will enhance customer satisfaction and loyalt. This study will help in robust the technology in the insurance sector which will also helps in the economic growth of the country. Some of the major limitation of the study are that study is based on a short-term analysis, and therefore the long-term impacts of innovation and digital transformation on insurance company performance were not captured. Also, difficulty in accessing reliable and up-to-date data from insurance companies due to confidentiality concerns or lack of digitized records and variability in the technical knowledge of respondents may affect the quality and depth of information shared, particularly in smaller or rural insurers.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li><strong>Methodology<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>2.1 Theoretical framework <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Innovation is still one of the key drivers of a firm&#8217;s competitiveness and profitability, especially in industries that are more service-oriented or regulation-laden, such as the insurance industry. On the basis of Schumpeter&#8217;s theoretical work on innovation as creative destruction, more recent theoretical developments discuss systemic or continuous innovation, as opposed to innovative interruptions or discontinuities. Schumpeter (2024) reinterprets the theoretical framework of innovation as a process of renewal, suggesting that firms that succeed in developing innovative goods, services, or production methods are more likely to remain profitable over time. Such an argument is particularly important for the insurance industry that is experiencing such rapid technological or digital change.<\/p>\n<p>The Dynamic Capabilities Theory, developed by Teece et al. in 1997, has seen numerous improvements in current literature. According to Teece, Peteraf, and Leih (2023), dynamic capabilities are no longer limited to \u201cadaptation\u201d but also include \u201cdigital ecosystem orchestration, data-driven decisioning, or platform-based service development.\u201d In the context of the insurance industry, dynamic capabilities help companies \u201cdetect new demands for coverage, such as micro-insurance or health insurance,\u201d exploit opportunities through \u201cre-designing products,\u201d and transform internal activities through \u201cleverage of automation &amp; analytics.\u201d Companies that do not cultivate dynamic capabilities face \u201cstrategic rigidity\u201d or reduced \u201cprofitability.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The OECD\u2019s Oslo Manual of 2018 is still one of the fundamentals for classifying innovation into its various forms of product, process, marketing, and org innovation areas. Current research evidence is consistent with the point that maximizing profitability benefits is achieved through diversified or complementary innovation achieved in these areas by insurance companies. Notably, product innovation (customized insurance products), for instance, is more financially rewarding through process innovation (online processing) and org innovation (agile-based decision-making). Customer adoption of innovative insurance services can be effectively accounted for by the diffusion of innovation theory (Rogers, 2003), which remains valid to this day in the context of digital finance research. It is universally acknowledged that in current studies, trust, perceived usefulness, and ease of use play important roles in determining the adoption of mobile-based insurance services.<\/p>\n<p>In emerging insurance markets like Nepal, diffusion of insurance services is realized to be a gradual process. When making new products, Kotler &amp;amp; Keller\u2019s (2016) way of thinking still works, but now it&#8217;s more about being quick, learning fast, and making things together with customers. All in all, what we know now says that innovation in insurance is not just about new products development, but about being able to change fast, new digital services, fitting into the bigger picture, and making things worth it for the customer. In Nepal&#8217;s insurance world, not many people use insurance and people don&#8217;t know much about it, so tech-based products and service can really help.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2.2 Nature of data and study area<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In Nepalese context, the insurance sector is comprised of 33 companies, of which 14 companies operate in life insurance business, 14 in non-life, and 7 in micro-insurance. To analyze the effect of product and service innovations on Profit of insurance companies, a census sampling technique will be used in this study since a very small number of companies will be surveyed due to which all companies operating in this sector will be surveyed.<\/p>\n<p>A mixed-methods study design will be conducted with main information gathered using structured questionnaires targeting a factual response towards product and service innovations and their impact on a firm\u2019s profitablity. The questionnaires will be designed for each type of insurance: life, non-life, micro-insurance. To complement information, in-depth interviews will be conducted with executives of micro-insurance companies to gain a better understanding of how innovations in product and service offerings have been incorporated into company strategy. The main information shall be gathered using structured questionnaires targeting a factual response towards product and service innovations and their impact on a firm\u2019s profitablity. The analysis will include descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation to make sense of the responses.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2.3 Questionnaire and Data Collection<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Data was collected from from fiscal Year 2077\/78 to 2081\/82. It included vital factors such as product development, product enhancement, accessibility to service delivery, and profit generation. Each year these parameters were constantly measured simultaneously to create a panel data set enabling a time series analysis of various innovation methods and their performances. Data on innovation spending, service delivery, and profit performance was collected annually, which makes it possible to perform inferential analysis.<\/p>\n<p>Apart from panel-data, other information gathered concerning companies includes type of insurance business, operation years, total number of employees, and the total number of active policyholders. The above factors are considered cross-sectional, which gives a descriptive detail cross-section. The above information was obtained through management-level respondents with a view to ensuring accuracy and relevance. The above combination of cross-sectional descriptions with panel-data information offered a complete platform upon which an investigation into the degree of innovation and impact on profit in the Nepalese insurance sector would be conducted. The methods used in this case were descriptive statistics, which were used to describe and summarize the whole dataset. The methods used in this case include mean, median, mode, standard deviation, and range descriptions. The methods described above aid in understanding the central tendencies and variability of data being studied.<\/p>\n<p>On the other side, inferential statistics were used in this case to conclude and infer information based on the entire study population but with a smaller samples analysis. The methods used in this case include regression analysis, which may have been used in this case to relate the different variables and make various predictions in relation to outcomes. Furthermore, inferential statistics in this case may have used statistics to see if different observations among different study populations are indeed accurate and have statistical significance. Tables were used in this case to present different results in light of regression equations if used in this case. The tables in this case may have used different statistics such as standard error, regression equations, and different levels of significance among other statistics. The importance of using both descriptive and inferential statistics in this case, in addition to using tables including regression equations, is therefore ensuring a thorough inspection of all data obtained in this case.<\/p>\n<p>We use methodical and structured methodology approach for data analysis for relaiablity of the results. Microsoft Excel was used to first compile and organise primary data on innovative practices and profitability in the insurance industry. STATA version 12 was then used for analysis. Frequency analysis, range checks, and data entry error correction were used to clean and validate the data before analysis. The summary provide the means, standard deviation, frequencies of insurance company\u2019s premium collection through new product development and innovation,\u00a0 customer how uses digital service of company, total number of policy holders, cost associated for development of new product and Net profit of the company.We use panel data analysis for the better result for five year\u2019s collected data. To figure out the innovation variables&#8217; and profitability indicators&#8217; interrelations, correlation analysis was executed. Following these interrelations, panel regression analysis was done to evaluate the effect of product development, product upgrade, and service accessibility on profitability. The Fixed Effects and Random Effects models were calculated, and the Hausman specification test helped to select the best model for this research<\/p>\n<p><strong>2.4 Model specification<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Based on the insurance industry in Nepal, this study proposes a conceptual framework where product &amp; service innovation, scales of operations, and cost control are considered independent variables, and profit of firms is considered a dependent variable. The independent variables in this study include product development, product improvement, service accessibility, total policy holder, and total cost.<\/p>\n<p>Product development signifies making new or niche products for customers based on shifting requirements and market demands. Product development can include making specialized products for specific risk cover, developing products for a specific demographic segment of customers, or designing products in accordance with shifting lifestyle requirements. Product improvement signifies making existing insurance products better by making insurance terms simpler, shortening claim processing time, and improving coverage options, therefore benefitting the customer in terms of increased satisfaction and added value.<\/p>\n<p>Accessibility of services measures customer interaction with the organization in making purchases, resolving queries, or using claim services. Improving accessibility can therefore increase customer reach and boost customer loyalty for an organization. The total policyholder is considered a scale factor for operations in an insurance organization and shows the size of the insurance organization&#8217;s customer\/insurance base. A higher total number of policyholders shows increased market presence with scale economies, hence improving the bottom-line profit for an insurance organization. Total cost shows financial outflows in operations, claims, and delivery of services.<\/p>\n<p>To quantitatively examine the impact of product and service innovations on the profitablity of insurance companies in Nepal, this research work proposes an empirical model including innovation factors into it as explanatory variables. In this model, three main factors are emphasized: product development, product enhancement, and service accessibility. The model&#8217;s dependent variable is firm profit, a representation of each individual insurance company&#8217;s performance in this study. The empirical model can be written in an equation form as:<\/p>\n<p>P<sub>it<\/sub>=\u03b2<sub>0<\/sub>+\u03b2<sub>1<\/sub>PD<sub>it<\/sub>+\u03b2<sub>2<\/sub>PIit+\u03b2<sub>3<\/sub>AS<sub>it<\/sub>+\u03b2<sub>4<\/sub>TP<sub>it <\/sub>+\u03b2<sub>5<\/sub>TC<sub>it <\/sub>+\u03f5<sub>it<\/sub><\/p>\n<p>Where,<\/p>\n<p><strong>P<\/strong> = Profit (dependent variable)<\/p>\n<p><strong>PD<\/strong> = Product Development<\/p>\n<p><strong>PI<\/strong> = Product Improvement<\/p>\n<p><strong>AS<\/strong> = Accessibility of Services<\/p>\n<p><strong>TP<\/strong> = Total Policyholder<\/p>\n<p><strong>TC<\/strong> = Total Cost<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u03b5<\/strong> = Error term (captures unobserved factors)<\/p>\n<p>The intercept \u03b2<sub>0<\/sub> reflects the baseline level of profitability when all explanatory variables are zero, while coefficients \u03b2<sub>1<\/sub>, \u03b2<sub>2 ,<\/sub>\u03b2<sub>3, <\/sub>\u03b2<sub>4 <\/sub>and \u03b2<sub>5<\/sub>\u200b measure the marginal effects of each independent variable on profitability. It is hypothesized that all three coefficients are positive, meaning that higher levels of product development, product improvement, and accessibility of services are expected to contribute to greater profitability.<\/p>\n<p>In order to identify an appropriate econometric approach to estimate these equations, this research therefore follows a systematic procedure for selecting a model in a panel data analysis, which is recommended by Dougherty (2007). When estimating in a panel setup with an observation derived from a random sample of firms over time, it is important to estimate both Fixed Effects and Random Effects models. In this case, Fixed Effects estimations assume equal slope vector parameters but varying intercept parameters among all firms, which consequently removes time-invariant but firm-specific factors. Alternatively, in a Random Effects model, such firm-specific effects will appear as random variables, incorporating both within and cross-sectional variability in a dataset. Once these two models are estimated, a Hausman specification test can be used to check which model structure, Fixed Effects or Random Effects, is better for a given dataset. Based on significance in a Hausman test statistic, if it is significant, a Fixed Effects model will be ideal; otherwise, a Random Effects model will be considered ideal. Therefore, this systematic approach will allow this research to make an efficient and sound judgment in selecting an ideal model to examine the effects of innovation on the relative profitability of insurance firms in Nepal.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong>Results <\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3><a name=\"_Toc1842431854\"><\/a>3.1 Structure of Insurance industry<\/h3>\n<p>Insurance industry in Nepal consists of firms with various services in the market, mostly classified under Life Insurance, Non-Life Insurance, and Micro Insurance. Among the total 33 firms in the industry, it is observed that 14 firms provide Life Insurance, 15 firms provide Non-Life Insurance, and 4 firms are Micro Insurance.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Life Insurance Companies pertain to products connected to life insurance, pension, or savings.<\/li>\n<li>Non-Life Insurance Companies, the focus revolves around general risks like property, automobiles, health, and other assets.<\/li>\n<li>Micro Insurance Companies are known for offering cheap insurance coverages that are primarily directed at the poor and those who live in rural<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Of the 33 insurance organizations functioning in Nepal, it is determined that 11 organizations are functioning for more than 20 years, 10 organizations are functioning for 11\u201320 years, 7 organizations are functioning for 5-10 years, and 5 organizations are functioning for less than 5 years.<\/p>\n<p>In terms of company types, there are 14 Life Insurance companies, 14 Non-Life Insurance companies, and 5 Micro Insurance companies<\/p>\n<p><strong>Table 1<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Insurance industry and its types<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-311038\" src=\"https:\/\/media.insurancekhabar.com\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Table-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"632\" height=\"278\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In comparison, Life Insurance companies are highly concentrated in the 5\u201310 years operation category, whereas Micro Insurance companies are entirely within the less than 5 years group. On the other hand, Non-Life Insurance companies dominate the 11\u201320 years category and also have the highest presence in the over 20 years category.<\/p>\n<h3><a name=\"_Toc1185464085\"><\/a>3.2 New product developement<\/h3>\n<p>Among the 33 insurance companies functioning in the Nepalese market, the total number of new insurance products introduced in the market over the past five years (fiscal year 2077\/78 to 2081\/82) is 164. When segmented by type, the Life Insurance companies have been the most active in new product development, launching 70 new products. This ranges from endowment plans, child education plans, pension plans, money-back plans, and health riders. Examples of these new products can be seen in the following plans from the different companies: LIC Nepal Jeevan Aanda and Dhan Biristi, whilst others are the iEnsure and Child Plan of Nepal Life and Prabhu Mahalaxmi Protect Plans.<\/p>\n<p>The number of New Products Introduced by Non-Life Insurance Companies is 73. The majority introduced similar products such as motor insurance, property insurance, accident insurance, livestock insurance, and agriculture insurance, along with some specialized insurance such as health insurance, index insurance, cybersecurity insurance, and engineering insurance. For instance, Shikhar Insurance introduced Cybersecurity Insurance, while Index Insurance was introduced by Rastriya Beema Company. On the flip side, Micro Insurance firms launched products amounting to 21. These were in line with their aim of financial inclusion and catering to the rural sector. These products included group credit term plans, child endowments, rural micro life insurance, and simplified term insurance. Guardian Micro Life and Crest Micro Life started actively offering many products to the unreached.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-311040\" src=\"https:\/\/media.insurancekhabar.com\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Table-2-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"663\" height=\"476\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Life Insurance firms have a greater degree of product diversification, with plans that revolve around customer needs and are related to saving, learning, and retirement plans. However, there are a greater number of policies issued under the Non-Life Insurance firms, pertaining mainly to conventional motor and property policies, with a couple of innovative extensions that deal with healthcare and cyber insurance. In contrast, there is a relatively low number of policies from the Micro Insurance firms, with a focus on low-cost policies that are directed towards the low-income sections of the population.<\/p>\n<p>The take-up of new products launched during the past five years indicates a strong industry trend, with 18 companies reporting that their new products contributed to more than 25% of their overall number of policies sold in FY 2081\/82. At the same time, 9 companies reported a moderate level (11\u201325%) of new product sales, with 6 having a minimal level (1\u201310%) of sales from new products, which shows that their industry mostly depends on old products.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, it could be agreed that this information emphasizes the fact that most companies within the life and non-life sectors of the industry mostly rely on new product lines to lure new customers into their organizations to remain ahead in the industry.<\/p>\n<h3><a name=\"_Toc1889083376\"><\/a>3.3 Product Improvement<\/h3>\n<p>The foregoing data clearly identifies the Nepal insurance market\u2019s ever-evolving nature in the refinement of products and demand fulfillment. Most of the insurers, especially the smaller to mid-sized ones, concentrated more on marginal improvements, which improved 1 to 5 products in the last five years. However, some of the bigger insurers, such as Asian Life, IGI Prudential, Met Life, and Rastriya Beema, improved more than 10 products, which clearly identifies the fact that the more experienced the firm, the more it innovates.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-311041\" src=\"https:\/\/media.insurancekhabar.com\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Chart-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"676\" height=\"205\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Figure 1 <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Improved Insurance Products in the Last 5 Years<a name=\"_Toc247892773\"><\/a> and Frequency of Product performance<\/p>\n<p>The frequency at which product review analysis is done portrays a planned process where a large number of insurers review their products quarterly, allowing them to be responsive to changing demands and regulatory needs. Some of the insurance company review the product performance annually and semi-annully, due to lack of capacity. Regarding customer feedback, the findings are encouraging to read. When improving their offerings, the majority of the surveyed organisations include customer feedback. This is evidence of the industry&#8217;s increased focus on the client. However, some non-life firms and microinsurers &#8220;maybe&#8221; employ consumer feedback.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Figure 2<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Customer Feedback<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-311043\" src=\"https:\/\/media.insurancekhabar.com\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Chart-2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"403\" height=\"268\" \/><\/p>\n<p>It gives a picture of an industry that is slowly modernizing, and it strikes a balance between the old way of product reviews and more structured innovation cycles. Also, the different levels of feedback integration point to the opportunities that exist within the companies to improve customer interaction to drive innovation.<\/p>\n<h3>3.4 Acessibility of Services<\/h3>\n<p>The data shows that customers&#8217; services are more accessible in the Nepalese insurance market, owing to the application of digital technology and alternate points of services. The vast majority of companies began using digital technology to purchase and renew policies in FY 2077\/78. Only a few, including Asian Life, IGI Prudential, Met Life, and Rastriya Beema, are yet to apply digital technology to enable customers to access their services through digital means. This puts them at a disadvantage in comparison to their competitors.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-311044\" src=\"https:\/\/media.insurancekhabar.com\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Chart-3.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"743\" height=\"315\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Besides digital access, some other modes of expansion by insurance firms included branchless and alternative service access points such as agents, kiosks, and electronic partners. Most firms have indicated an average of 3 to 5 service points, while major insurance firms such as Prabhu Insurance and SuryaJyoti Life have opened 10 service points each, indicating extensive outreach programs. Other insurance firms, such as Himalayan Life, LIC Nepal, Nepal Micro, Protective Micro, and The Oriental Insurance, have indicated zero alternative service points.<\/p>\n<p>It is also evident from the data that claim settlement time is another accessibility parameter. Though micro-insurers such as Guardian Micro and Nepal Micro have claim settlement times of 2 and 5 days, respectively, most life and non-life insurers take an average of 18-26 days, which might hamper customer satisfaction. Insurers should make improvements in this regard in terms of claim handling accessibility. In general, the results reveal that the insurance sector in Nepal is getting increasingly enabled with technology and consumer-centric, but gaps exist; some companies are very technology and branchless channel-friendly, while the rest are poorly performing in processing claims and having service touch points..<\/p>\n<h2>3.5 Relationship between Product and Service innovation adoption and profitability<\/h2>\n<p>In order to estimate the effect of product and service innovations on the profitability of insurers in Nepal, similar approaches are adopted in the process of choosing a model in panel data analysis. Because it involves data on various insurers and is collected annually for more than five years, it is necessary to estimate both Fixed Effects and Random Effects models. In Fixed Effects analysis, it is possible to control variables that are specific to each insurer and do not change over time. In Random Effects analysis, it is assumed that those variables are random and are also unrelated to other variables. Once both Fixed Effects and Random Effects are estimated, it is necessary to conduct Hausman tests in order to see what model fits better. If it is significant, Fixed Effects model is selected. Otherwise, Random Effects model is supposed to be better. In this context, it is possible to apply an approach that could help identify an unbiased model and estimate its effect accurately on the profitability of insurers in Nepal. The analysis gives information based on the results of a random effects regression analysis on the impact of operational variables on organizational profitability. Random effects regression analysis is commonly used in panel data analysis, in situations where data is collected over various units, such as branches in an organization. Random effects regression analysis differs from fixed effects regression analysis in terms of assumptions. Fixed effects regression analysis assumes the differences in units&#8217; unobserved components are systematically related to observed variables. On the other hand, random effects regression analysis assumes the unobservable components are random with values uncorrelated with those of observed variables. The random effects regression analysis is essential in providing estimates on how independent variables affect a dependent variable, in this case, profit.<\/p>\n<p>However, this analysis requires estimates on the overall fit. An R-squared measure with a value of 0.28 indicates that 28 percent of variation in profit is accounted for by independent variables including product development, product improvement, accessibility of services, total policy holders, and total cost. On the other hand, though 28 percent may appear quite low as an R-square measure in ordinary regression analysis, in social and economic analysis, with so many variables unexplored, this is quite common. On the other hand, the Wald chi-square test is 15.6 and may be applicable in testing joint significance of predictors, in this study, as much as reported p-value appears not to resemble this test.<\/p>\n<p>However, comparison of coefficients is more appropriate in testing significance. This analysis runs on an assumption that correlation between specific effects in units and regressors is 0. On this basis, random effects analysis estimates are appropriate. There are five observations in each entity making up this analysis. On this basis, the analysis is balanced, hence allows for improved estimates in variance components.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Table 3 <\/strong><em>Random Effect Test <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-311045\" src=\"https:\/\/media.insurancekhabar.com\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Table-3.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"717\" height=\"689\" \/><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Analyzing the individual variables, the effect of product development on the profit is very weak and insignificant. The coefficient is positively framed with a value of 0.005 and standard error of 0.004, Giving it a z-score and corresponding probability of 1.25 and 0.211 respectively. This is an indication that although it is positively related to the profit level, it is insignificant. Moreover, the confidence interval is observed to be between the negative and positive bounds for this variable. This may have indicated that in the process of developing new products, the organization may not necessarily record increased profits immediately due to the time taken for the development process and market acceptance. On the other hand, the effect of the improvement made on the current products on the profit is very significant with coefficient of 0.35 and standard error of 0.12. It is significant in determining the profit as z-score and probability of 2.92 and 0.003 respectively with the confidence interval\u00a0 of 0.115 and 0.585. Assicebilty of servicces have coffecient value of\u00a0 2.1 and standard error of 0.89 with a z-score and probability of 2.36 and 0.018 respectively. Another determinant for the profits obtained by the organization is the total policy holders. This is another variable that is very significant. The total policy is positively framed with values of 40.5 and standard error of 12.5. This provides the model with a z-score and probability of 3.24 and 0.001 respectively. This is an indication that this particular variable is significant in determining the level of profits for the organization. Moreover, the confidence interval is within the bounds of 15.96 and 65.04 for this particular variable.<\/p>\n<p>Total cost has a positive coefficient of 15 with a standard error of 10, giving a z-value of 1.5 and a corresponding p-value of 0.133. However, since the effect is positive, it is not a statistically significant effect. Moreover, the confidence interval does contain zero, suggesting that there is no clear overall effect of cost on profit. Perhaps the nature of operational expenses is such that while some expenses are productivity-enhancing, others are not necessarily profit-enhancing right away. However, if these effects are known, what can be discovered is how exactly these expenses can be allocated more effectively and productively. However, the value of the constant is quite large, with a value of 2.48E+08, and a standard error of 1.2E+08, giving a z-value of 4.33, and thus a very strong significance level. This also means that if the independent variables were zero, the organization still produces a substantial profit, suggesting that there is a fixed level of organizational productivity and efficiency, although it is possible that other unknown and unmeasured variables are also behind such a strong profit level. Another way of explaining variances is through variance components. Here, sigma u, or the standard error of entity effects, is 1.8 billion, while that of the error, sigma e, is 2.4E+08. The proportion of total variance of profit that is due to the difference between entities is measured by the value of rho, or 0.36, suggesting that fully 36 percent of the variance of profit can be traced to differences between entities, probably such that organizational level variables such as organizational performance and effectiveness, and organizational behavior, play a vital and important role. The findings have important managerial implications. With regard to operational variables considered, product development, accessibility, and total policy holder variables are revealed as significantly influencing profit. In comparison, investments for improving existing products or services, as well as increasing the number of total policy holders, are more effective. This is because, based on customer preference, improving products will ensure better profit. In addition, it will also ensure better customer participation, customer loyalty, and renewal, ultimately leading to increasing revenues.\u00a0 This study also emphasises how important it is to recognise the diversity among entities. According to the analysis, entities account for the majority of the variation.<\/p>\n<p>This variation may arise based on their working, regional, or management aspects. The primary reason for neglecting it is that it may lead to unaccurate estimate forecasting. By adopting random effect, it is possible to compare within-entity change over time as well as variations, ultimately leading to accurate forecasting. The random effects regression model offers a holistic approach to understanding the workings of the variables employed and their impact on the profitability of the organization. These results offer conclusive proof of the factors that have the greatest contribution to profitability and provide a holistic understanding of the working of the variables employed. Product enhancement and the expansion of customers have the greatest contribution to profitability. Product development and the total cost amount to little contribution to the profitability of an organization. This study also concludes the relevance of taking into consideration the entity variations while analyzing the panel data since the profit variation largely comprises entity variations.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Discussion<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The insurance market in Nepal exhibits descriptive characteristics that offer useful insights into how various firm categories approach innovation and why the immediate financial effects seem to be small. In Nepal&#8217;s changing urban and semi-urban markets, life insurers typically highlight a variety of customer-focused product lines that address household goals, such as endowment plans, savings-linked products, child education protection, and pension-oriented schemes. Non-life insurers, on the other hand, typically use standardised lines such auto, property, health, accident, livestock, and agricultural insurance. With the objective of insurance inclusion, micro insurance companies are providing low-cost, simplified products that are affordable for lower income group and rural house-holds and are offered through insurance agents, co-operatives, micro finance companies and digital wallets. Small and sachetized products help insurance business penetrate in the market and stay strong (Pant and Kc 2017; Risal et al. 2022; Yehorycheva et al. 2020).With the help of technologies insurance company are making better\u00a0 and easier services for the customers around the world (Khadka 2023; Almatrooshi et al. 2016). Insurance companies are using customer feedback to make their products and processes better, for both life and other types of insurance.\u00a0 Through customer feedback and better online services to customer to keep their policies and bring down complains and build trust. But all the different places and levels of customer education mean companies need to make people more aware and explain the good things about their biz in simple terms, something that studies in Nepal talk about a lot. Companies that can figure out what customers need and make that into something valuable will be in a better spot to keep doing well as the market gets more developed. This is just basic stuff for how to do well in the markets, and it&#8217;s been shown to work for financial places in countries that are still getting rich.<\/p>\n<p>The findings of this observe are that product development, product improvement, and carrier accessibility are definitely but in large part insignificantly associated with profitability within the short time period. This is constant with well-documented themes in the innovation literature; returns on innovation often seem over longer durations due to the fact customers, channels, and inner strategies take time to regulate, and due to the fact constructing new abilities entails upfront fees. Incremental in addition to radical improvements generally go through prolonged adoption cycles before economic profits appear, specifically in agree with-extensive industries like insurance, whose coverage uptake relies upon on recognition, distribution attain, and claim credibility. Study shows that through product innovation customer are getting delight and effecient operational service with measurable improvements in profits. For better customer experience insurance companies are reviewing products every quarter, easy buying and renewing products with quicker claims for micro insurance companies. Same as in Nepal, ukrane also faces strict regulations despite innovations and their profits don\u2019t jump right away. This study shows that, small improvment and tweaking the exsiting products and accessible to that service will works better then new products.<\/p>\n<p>Also, in Nairobi it is found that with simpler and online produts with faster claims keeps customer satisfactions with lower cost which convert into better profits. Similarly in Nepal also, insurers redesign their product change the prices and focusing on making their services easy and good. We found that total number of policy holder akso determine the profit of the company in Nepal as well as in India so, as more people become happy customers and recommend the service, more others will adopt; growth will come naturally.\u00a0 Innovation in Insurance sector of Nepal is profitable like elsewhere because\u00a0 it is easy to create and develop new product and companies make money because through prices, coverage, and how they sell their coverage can be changed easily. But due to strict regulation of insurance regulator, insurers have to operate under rules that don\u2019t give them fleaxible on prices and features of the products which will constraints slow turning innovation into revenue. Though customers get benefited and insurer company get better returns but rules and regulations slow down innovation and reduce profit of company. All insurance companies tries to innovate, some companies are better at innovation because of data skills and better digital infrastructure. Good digital skills helps in innovation by improving their process and selling products online and faster claim process by bigger insurance company\u00a0 which all leads to more profit in data-heavy places. Also, insurer collaborate with wallet company and telecome service by embedding the insurance product for better inclusion for insurance.<\/p>\n<p>Stabilize the service and reduce errors helps improving process for increasing profit in the short term. Also, customers and buying insurance online through insurance companies app and other digital app services. In a controlled rules and adoption lags, innovation is very crucial and critical in Nepal\u2019s insurance sector which will effect in profits.Nepal Insurance Authority, Government of Nepal and concerned stake holder should promote and facilitate easy product approval process and support in creation of digital infrastructure across the industry, and encouraging insurers, payment platforms, and tech companies to work together.\u00a0 This study will helps in profit gains, building innovation into a base for sustainable growth and more inclusive insurance in Nepal.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li><strong>Policy Implications<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Policy implications drawn from this study highlight the crucial role of regulatory authorities, particularly the Nepal Insurance Authority, in creating an environment that supports innovation while maintaining market stability and consumer protection. Although existing regulations help ensure standardization and safeguard policyholders, excessive rigidity in product design, pricing, and promotional controls limits insurers\u2019 ability to innovate effectively. The findings indicate that service innovation, including digital claims processing, online premium payments, and improved service accessibility, has a more immediate and significant influence on profitability than product development alone. Therefore, policymakers should consider adopting a more flexible and risk-based regulatory framework that allows insurers to experiment with innovative service delivery models and digital solutions under controlled conditions. Initiatives such as regulatory sandboxes, phased approvals for innovative services, and supportive guidelines for digital transformation can encourage innovation without undermining regulatory objectives.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, the study emphasizes the importance of policy support for collaboration among insurers, digital payment service providers, telecommunication companies, and technology firms to expand insurance accessibility and financial inclusion. Policies that promote interoperability of digital systems, secure data-sharing mechanisms, and investment in digital infrastructure can help reduce operational inefficiencies and enhance service quality across the insurance industry. Moreover, regulatory focus on capacity-building initiatives, such as digital skill development for insurance employees and incentives for technology adoption, can accelerate the shift from traditional operational models to customer-centric and technology-driven practices. By fostering innovation-oriented policies and strengthening institutional readiness, regulators can enhance the long-term profitability, sustainability, and competitiveness of Nepal\u2019s insurance sector while contributing to overall economic development.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong>Conclusion <\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Innovation emerges as a highly important and complex factor that affects the profitability and competitiveness of insurance companies operating in Nepal. While the results obtained through quantitative research indicate that innovation initiatives like product development lack any sort of short-term statistical significance in terms of organizational profit, other aspects like product enhancement, service accessibility, and an increase in the policyholders\u2019 base add up to a significantly large extent towards organizational success. Various observations made in the study point towards the fact that the profitabilty in the insurance sector that operates within Nepal is affected not only by the innovation processes but also by intra-organizational aspects like managerial acumen, working techniques, and the unavailability or lack of access to certain organizational resources. Though the adoption and implementation processes within the insurance sector in Nepal face certain challenges due to the absence or lack of certain opportunities, the sector is adapting slowly towards digitalization. This fact can be realized by the successful implementation of various digital processes like online claims submission, digital policies, mobile payment facilities, and digital customer services and have great implications for policymakers, regulator, and area players.<\/p>\n<p>The Nepal Insurance Athority should create favorable regime for innovation atmosphere and supporting purchaser safety and market law. As, NIA has capacity to play a full-size function in bringing in extra relaxed regulatory norms.They also can create the environment and platform where insurer and stake holder can experimentation, development of the virtual infrastructure within the sector, and ability building initiatives within the region.<\/p>\n<p>The insurance companies and digital payment partner, telecome service providers come with together and use better technologies throughfaster transactions and bring people under financial and insurance inclusion. Awareness generation for the attributes of the insurance policies, the dissemination of appropriate data-driven information by the delivery of superior quality, as well as the process of knowledge sharing for the industry, will, apart from the ease of the adaptability of innovation, generate even superior performance for the whole industry. Innovation is playing a crucial role in the enhancement of the sustainability and effectiveness of the Nepalese insurance industry, despite the short-term benefits for the economy, which are not unfailingly improved. As the industry continues to march ahead in the coming years, the cumulative process for the advantage of the consumers, which has been developed by means of superior support infrastructure, shall help to reach the maximum financial benefits. This research study being undertaken in this essay has been able to play the role of determining that a mix of product innovation, customer service innovation, coupled with the steadily increasing consumer base, shall help to explore the enhancement of the superiority level in profitability, in the process of generating the creation of consumers, apart from the aid to the development of the industry for the Nepalese insurance company.<\/p>\n<p>The study suggest following recommendations for Insurance company, policy makers and all the realtive stakeholders.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Insurance companies should focus on improving their services, simplifying claims, and facilitating simpler internet accessall of which don&#8217;t require a radical strategy.<\/li>\n<li>Development and Investment in Virtual Infrastructure and Human Resources \u2013 Insurance firms should invest in digital platforms for policy management and payment processing in order to have efficiency. Integration with other platforms such as eSewa and Khalti can also enhance consumer convenience.<\/li>\n<li>Develop an innovation-facilitating regulatory framework: Regulators must permit biotechnological products innovation, use of digital technology, and pricing schemes. Detailed regulations regarding data usage, cyber protection, and biotechnological product approval could assist biotechnology companies in innovating. The NIA can aid learning by providing knowledge-sharing platforms.<\/li>\n<li>Improve cooperation, partnerships, and awareness: Collaborations with fintech firms, microfinance institutions, or community organizations may increase the penetration of insurance. Insurance awareness campaigns conducted through the media or community activities may bring about an improvement in the awareness level of people about the benefits of insurance. Insurance schemes in groups in an institution like a school or a cooperative may bring about an increase in their coverage.<\/li>\n<li>Encourage data-driven product and service design. Insurers need to rely on analytics tools, customer feedback, and risk assessment engines to create better products. Data-driven decision-making enables better customer needs assessment and pricing. Policymakers need to ensure proper usage standards for customer safety.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>If insurance companies in Nepal act on these suggestions, they could run things better and grow steadily. To help this happen, those in charge and the Nepal Insurance Authority should set up rules and organizations that encourage new ideas, tech use, and including more people in the money system. Hopefully, doing all this will mean Nepal has a good, competitive insurance scene.<\/p>\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>AKI. (2020). Insurance Industry Annual Report. Association of Kenya Insurers.<\/p>\n<p>Almatrooshi, B., Singh, S. K., &amp; Farouk, S. (2016). Determinants of organizational performance: a proposed framework.\u00a0International Journal of productivity and performance management,\u00a065(6), 844-859.<\/p>\n<p>Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., Hatfield, D. E., &amp; Cardinal, L. B. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&amp;D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. <em>Journal of Product Innovation Management<\/em>, 27(5), 725\u2013740.<\/p>\n<p>Aryal, L. Performace And Growth Analysis Of Insurance Business In Nepal. (2019).<\/p>\n<p>Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2020). <em>Digital Financial Services in South Asia<\/em>. ADB.<\/p>\n<p>Azamat, O., Sherzod, S., Dilshod, S., Gulyar, K., Gulnur, A., Zarifa, K., &amp; Sarvar, T. (2023). The Role of Digital Technology in the Future of Insurance and Economic Development.\u00a0Journal of Law and Sustainable Development,\u00a011(5), e1081-e1081.<\/p>\n<p>Barbara, L., &amp; Kara, M. (2016). Strategic transformation and digital readiness: A comprehensive approach. Journal of Business Strategy, 37(5), 23\u201332.<\/p>\n<p>Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99\u2013120.<\/p>\n<p>Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., &amp; Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights.\u00a0MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471-482.<\/p>\n<p>Bhattarai, B. P. (2020). Factors influencing profitability of insurance companies in Nepal.\u00a0<em>International Journal of Management<\/em>,\u00a0<em>11<\/em>(9).<\/p>\n<p>Charumathi, B. (2012). On the determinants of profitability of Indian life insurers \u2013 An empirical study. <em>International Journal of Research in Commerce &amp; Management, 3<\/em>(1), 1-6.<\/p>\n<p>Chen, X. H., &amp; Zhang, L. (2023). Insurance density and the digital economic development: a China perspective.\u00a0<em>Economic research-Ekonomska istra\u017eivanja,<\/em>\u00a036(2).<\/p>\n<p>Christensen, C. M. (1997). <em>The Innovator\u2019s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail<\/em>. Harvard Business School Press.<\/p>\n<p>Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. <em>Business Horizons, 33<\/em>(3), 44\u201354.<\/p>\n<p>Crawford, C. (2015). <em>Insurance and economic growth: Evidence from emerging markets<\/em>. World Bank.<\/p>\n<p>Cummins, J. D., &amp; Weiss, M. A. (2014). Systemic risk and the U.S. insurance sector. <em>Journal of Risk and Insurance<\/em>, 81(3), 489\u2013528.<\/p>\n<p>Cummins, J. D., Rubio-Misas, M., &amp; Vencappa, D. (2017). Competition, efficiency and soundness in European life insurance markets. <em>Journal of Financial Stability<\/em>, 28, 66\u201378.<\/p>\n<p>Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., &amp; Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance. <em>Journal of Management Studies<\/em>, 46(4), 650\u2013675.<\/p>\n<p>Deloitte. (2024). <em>2025 global insurance outlook: Evolving industry operating models to build the future of insurance<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Den Hertog, P. (2000). Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. <em>International Journal of Innovation Management<\/em>, 4(4), 491\u2013528.<\/p>\n<p>Eckert, C., &amp; Osterrieder, K. (2020). How digitalization affects insurance companies: overview and use cases of digital technologies.\u00a0<em>Zeitschrift f\u00fcr die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft,<\/em>\u00a0109(5), 333-360.<\/p>\n<p>Economic Survey. (2022). Economic Survey 2021\/22. Ministry of Finance, Government of Nepal.<\/p>\n<p>EIOPA. (2021). <em>Digitalisation in the European Insurance Sector<\/em>. European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.<\/p>\n<p>Eling, M., &amp; Lehmann, M. (2018). The impact of digitalization on the insurance value chain and the insurability of risks.\u00a0<em>The Geneva papers on risk and insurance-issues and practice<\/em>,\u00a043, 359-396.<\/p>\n<p>Eling, M., &amp; Lehmann, M. (2018). The impact of digitalization on the insurance value chain and the insurability of risks.\u00a0*Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 43*(3), 359-396.<\/p>\n<p>Gallouj, F., &amp; Savona, M. (2009). Innovation in services. <em>Cambridge Journal of Economics<\/em>, 33(2), 149\u2013172.<\/p>\n<p>Gimpel, H., Rau, D., &amp; R\u00f6glinger, M. (2018). Understanding fintech start-ups \u2013 a taxonomy of consumer-oriented service offerings.\u00a0<em>Electronic Markets, 28<\/em>(3), 245-264.<\/p>\n<p>Hill, C. W. L., &amp; Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. <em>Academy of Management Review, 28<\/em>(2), 257-274.<\/p>\n<p>Jerman, A., Bertoncelj, A., &amp; Erenda, I. (2019). The influence of critical factors on business model at a smart factory: A case study.\u00a0<em>Business Systems Research: International journal of the Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy<\/em>,\u00a0<em>10<\/em>(1), 42-52.<\/p>\n<p>Jerman, D. (2020). Strategic innovation in insurance companies: Path to a sustainable competitive advantage. <em>Journal of Business Strategy, 41<\/em>(3), 25\u201334.<\/p>\n<p>Johnson, G., Scholes, K., &amp; Whittington, R. (2011). <em>Exploring Strategy: Text and Cases<\/em> (9th ed.). Pearson Education.<\/p>\n<p>Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., &amp; Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. <em>MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Khadka, S. (2023). Effect of firm specific and macroeconomic factors on profitability of Nepalese insurance companies.\u00a0T<em>he Lumbini Journal of Business and Economics<\/em>,\u00a011(1), 232-251.<\/p>\n<p>Kibicho, P. M. (2015). Determinants of strategy implementation success in the insurance industry: A survey of insurance companies in Kenya.\u00a0<em>International Journal of Business and Social Science<\/em>,\u00a0<em>6<\/em>(4), 74-91.<\/p>\n<p>Kodama, M. (2018). Developing strategic innovation capability: An analysis of diversification strategies of telecommunications firms in Japan. <em>Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 124<\/em>, 43\u201356.<\/p>\n<p>Kotler, P., &amp; Keller, K. L. (2016). <em>Marketing management<\/em> (15th ed.). Pearson.<\/p>\n<p>Lanfranchi, D., &amp; Grassi, L. (2021). Examining insurance companies\u2019 use of technology for innovation.\u00a0<em>The Geneva papers on risk and insurance. Issues and practice<\/em>,\u00a0<em>47<\/em>(3), 520.<\/p>\n<p>Lee, I., &amp; Shin, Y. J. (2018). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. <em>Business Horizons<\/em>, 61(1), 35\u201346.<\/p>\n<p>Ma, D., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., &amp; Wang, Z. (2025). Can digital technology innovation enhance the corporate profitability?.\u00a0<em>Applied Economics<\/em>, 1-15.<\/p>\n<p>Madsen, S., &amp; Hartington, A. (2015). Disruptive technologies and digital transformation. <em>Journal of Innovation Management, 3<\/em>(2), 1\u201310.<\/p>\n<p>Mafini, C. (2015). Predicting organisational performance through innovation, quality and inter-organisational systems: A public sector perspective.\u00a0<em>Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR)<\/em>,\u00a0<em>31<\/em>(3), 939-952.<\/p>\n<p>Mbocho, M. (2020). Strategic innovation and organizational performance in manufacturing firms in Kenya. African Journal of Management and Strategy, 12(1), 45\u201359.<\/p>\n<p>Morara, M., &amp; Sibindi, A. B. (2021). Effect of insurance claims on financial performance of insurance companies. Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis, 5(2), 67\u201383.<\/p>\n<p>Mustafina, A. A., Kaigorodova, G. N., Alyakina, P. D., Velichko, N. Y., &amp; Zainullina, M. R. (2020). Digital technology in insurance. <em>In\u00a0Digital transformation of the economy: Challenges, trends and new opportunities<\/em>\u00a0(pp. 678-685). Springer International Publishing.<\/p>\n<p>Mutembei, M., &amp; Njuguna, A. (2019). Effects of financial liberalization on performance of insurance companies in Kenya. International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8(3), 72\u201380.<\/p>\n<p>Narver, J. C., &amp; Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. <em>Journal of Marketing, 54<\/em>(4), 20\u201335.<\/p>\n<p>Nduati, M. (2017). Strategic innovation and performance of manufacturing firms in Kenya. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 3(2), 89\u201396.<\/p>\n<p>Nduati, P. M. (2020). Influence Of Strategic Innovation On Performance Of Manufacturing Firms In Kenya: A Literature Based Review.\u00a0<em>African Journal of Emerging Issues<\/em>,\u00a0<em>2<\/em>(6), 55-66.<\/p>\n<p>Nepal Insurance Authority. (2023). <em>Insurance Act, 2079<\/em>. Government of Nepal.<\/p>\n<p>Nepal Insurance Authority. (2023). Regulatory Guidelines and Annual Report. Kathmandu: NIA.<\/p>\n<p>Nepal Insurance Authority. (2023). <em>Regulatory Guidelines for Insurance Products and Marketing Practices in Nepal<\/em>. Kathmandu: NIA.<\/p>\n<p>Ng, I. C., &amp; Wakenshaw, S. Y. (2017). The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions.\u00a0<em>International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34<\/em>(1), 3-21.<\/p>\n<p>Niraula, P., &amp; Kautish, S. (2019). Study of the digital transformation adoption in the insurance sector of Nepal.\u00a0<em>LBEF Research Journal of Science, Technology and Management<\/em>,\u00a0<em>1<\/em>(1), 43-60.<\/p>\n<p>Njeri, A. (2017).\u00a0<em>Effects of innovation strategy on firm performance in telecommunications industry: A case of Safaricom Kenya limited<\/em>\u00a0(Doctoral dissertation, United States International University-Africa).<\/p>\n<p>Njeri, M. (2017). Product innovation strategy and performance in Kenya\u2019s telecommunication sector. Journal of Strategic Management, 4(2), 15\u201325.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nyoro, W., &amp; Kinyua, G. M. (2025).<\/strong> Innovation capability as a predictor of firm performance: A systematic review of literature. <em>International Journal of Education and Research, 13<\/em>(3), 91\u2013102.<\/p>\n<p>OECD. (2005). <em>Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data<\/em>. OECD Publishing.<\/p>\n<p>OECD. (2020). <em>Innovation, Productivity and Sustainability in Financial Services<\/em>. OECD Publishing.<\/p>\n<p>Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). <em>Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation<\/em>. OECD Publishing.<\/p>\n<p>Palmer, D., &amp; Kaplan, S. (2007). A framework for strategic innovation.\u00a0<em>Blending strategy and creativity to discover future business opportunities. San Francisco, USA: InnovationPoint. Search in<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Palmer, R., &amp; Kaplan, R. (2016). <em>Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage<\/em>. Harvard Business Review Press.<\/p>\n<p>Pant, S., &amp; Kc, F. B. (2017). Contribution of insurance in economic growth of <em>Nepal.\u00a0Journal of Advanced Academic Research<\/em>,\u00a04(1), 99-110<\/p>\n<p>Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., &amp; Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. <em>Journal of Service Research, 7<\/em>(3), 213\u2013233.<\/p>\n<p>Parviainen, P., Tihinen, M., K\u00e4\u00e4ri\u00e4inen, J., &amp; Teppola, S. (2017). Tackling the digitalization challenge: how to benefit from digitalization in practice.\u00a0<em>International journal of information systems and project management<\/em>,\u00a0<em>5<\/em>(1), 63-77.<\/p>\n<p>Paudel, S., Agal, S. N., &amp; Kumar, V. (2021). Information Technology Outsourcing in Nepal: Strengths, Challenges, and Priorities.\u00a0<em>Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research<\/em>,\u00a04(4), 1-22.<\/p>\n<p>Pearson, N., &amp; Robinson, R. (2007). <em>Strategic Management: Formulation, Implementation, and Control<\/em> (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.<\/p>\n<p>Porter, M. E., &amp; Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition.\u00a0<em>Harvard Business Review, 92<\/em>(11), 64-88.<\/p>\n<p>Risal, N., Karki, B., &amp; Sharma, A. (2022). Life insurance policy holders and their perception of life insurance services in Kathmandu, Nepal.\u00a0Empirical Economics Letters,\u00a021(4), 167-181.<\/p>\n<p>Rogers, E. M. (2003). <em>Diffusion of innovations<\/em> (5th ed.). Free Press.<\/p>\n<p>Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., &amp; Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? <em>Journal of Business Venturing<\/em>, 26(4), 441\u2013457.<\/p>\n<p>Rutere, Y. K., &amp; Kori, B. (2023). Strategic Innovation And Performance Of The \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Insurance Sector In Nairobi County, Kenya.\u00a0<em>International Journal of \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Management and Business Research<\/em>,\u00a0<em>5<\/em>(2), 320-332.<\/p>\n<p>Saeed, M., Arshed, N., &amp; Zhang, H. (2022). The adaptation of Internet of Things in the Indian Insurance Industry\u2014Reviewing the challenges and potential solutions.\u00a0Electronics,\u00a011(3), 419.<\/p>\n<p>Sapa, S. G., Phunde, S. B., &amp; Godbole, M. R. (2014). Impacts of ICT application on the insurance sector (e-insurance).\u00a0<em>IBMRD&#8217;s Journal of Management &amp; Research<\/em>,\u00a0<em>3<\/em>(1), 311-320.<\/p>\n<p>Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). <em>The theory of Economic development<\/em>. Harvard University Press.<\/p>\n<p>Schumpeter, J. A. (2024). On the Nature of Economic Crises 1. In\u00a0Business Cycle Theory, Part II Volume 5\u00a0(pp. 5-50). Routledge.<\/p>\n<p>Schwab, K. (2018). <em>The Fourth Industrial Revolution<\/em>. World Economic Forum.<\/p>\n<p>Sharma, P., &amp; Kumar, R. (2017). Regulation and innovation in insurance markets. <em>Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance<\/em>, 42(4), 620\u2013643.<\/p>\n<p>Singh, A., Hess, T., &amp; Gopalakrishnan, S. (2016). Organizational challenges in digital transformation: A case study approach. <em>Journal of Strategy and Management, 9<\/em>(1), 63\u201381.<\/p>\n<p>Sl\u00e1vik, \u0160., &amp; Bedn\u00e1rov\u00e1, V. (2024). Factors and circumstances affecting the business performance of firms based on new technologies. <em>Problems and Perspectives in Management<\/em>, <em>22<\/em>(3), 458\u2013474. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21511\/ppm.22(3).2024.35\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21511\/ppm.22(3).2024.35<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Subedi, S., Giri, A. D., Aadhikari, S., &amp; Shrestha, S. 2020 <em>Technology Readiness Of Insurance Services<\/em>: A Case Study Of Nepal.<\/p>\n<p>Subedi, S., Giri, A. D., Aadhikari, S., &amp; Shrestha, S. Technology Readiness Of Insurance Services: A Case Study Of Nepal.<em> In\u00a0International Conferences On E-Society 2023 And Mobile Learning 2023<\/em>\u00a0(p. 203).<\/p>\n<p>Swiss Re Institute. (2022). <em>World Insurance Report<\/em>. Swiss Re.<\/p>\n<p>Thapa, P. B. (2024)Role of Insurance Sector in Economic Development of a Nation, Article of Prajwal Bikram Thapa.<\/p>\n<p>Tidd, J., &amp; Bessant, J. (2018). <em>Managing Innovation<\/em> (6th ed.). Wiley<\/p>\n<p>Udriyah, U., Tham, J., &amp; Azam, S. J. M. S. L. (2019). The effects of market orientation and innovation on competitive advantage and business performance of textile SMEs.\u00a0<em>Management Science Letters<\/em>,\u00a0<em>9<\/em>(9), 1419-1428.<\/p>\n<p>UNCTAD. (2021). <em>Digital Economy Report<\/em>. United Nations.<\/p>\n<p>Varadarajan, R. (2018). Innovation, innovation strategy, and strategic innovation. <em>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46<\/em>(3), 361\u2013383.<\/p>\n<p>Varadarajan, R. (2018). Innovation, innovation strategy, and strategic innovation. In\u00a0<em>Innovation and strategy<\/em>\u00a0(pp. 143-166). Emerald Publishing Limited.<\/p>\n<p>World Bank. (2019). <em>Fintech and the Future of Finance<\/em>. World Bank Publications.<\/p>\n<p>Yang, K. (2001). Technology and competitive advantage: An empirical study of firms in high-tech industries. <em>Technology in Society, 23<\/em>(3), 315\u2013331.<\/p>\n<p>Yehorycheva, S., Hudz, T., Palchuk, O., &amp; Boiko, N. (2020). Innovations in the insurance market of a developing country: Case of Ukraine.\u00a0<em>Investment Management &amp; Financial Innovations<\/em>,\u00a0<em>17<\/em>(4), 175.<\/p>\n<p>Zhuravka, O. S., Medvid, A., &amp; Zhuravka, A. (2023). Current trends in insurance market digitalization.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong><em>(BK is Assistant Manager at Insurance Business Development Department of eSewa Ltd.)<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0Anish BK Abstract The insurance industry in Nepal is regulated highly, with products that have very little differentiation in their nature, with restricted pricing, and with customers whose expectations are changing fast. This study assesses the impact of product development, product enhancement, and service accessibility on the profitability of insurance companies in Nepal. Additionally, it [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":311047,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45031,45159,45156],"tags":[78385,78387,73764,78389,70672,78391],"class_list":["post-311036","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-banner-news-en","category-news-en","category-blog-en","tag-anishbk","tag-articleofinsurance-en","tag-insurancearticle-en","tag-insurancebusiness-en","tag-article-en","tag-esewa-en"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insurancekhabar.com\/ikbrapi\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311036","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insurancekhabar.com\/ikbrapi\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insurancekhabar.com\/ikbrapi\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insurancekhabar.com\/ikbrapi\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insurancekhabar.com\/ikbrapi\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=311036"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/insurancekhabar.com\/ikbrapi\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311036\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":311048,"href":"https:\/\/insurancekhabar.com\/ikbrapi\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311036\/revisions\/311048"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insurancekhabar.com\/ikbrapi\/wp\/v2\/media\/311047"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insurancekhabar.com\/ikbrapi\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=311036"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insurancekhabar.com\/ikbrapi\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=311036"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insurancekhabar.com\/ikbrapi\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=311036"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}